For these two topics I'm of the opinion that everything should be on the table when we talk about how to solve these two issues. Everything. As those issues are flushed out we can then decide that they are good or bad and then throw them out if needed but they at the very least need to be entertained. Now for my opinions on the gun issue...
My disclaimers: I think most that have read my past posts or see my Facebook status' will know that I'm a pretty liberal leaning guy. I don't own a gun. I've never fired a gun. I've had no real interests in guns because I wasn't raised around them and when I started my family I didn't want them in my house around young children. Now that my children are older I've developed the urge to go to a shooting range and learn how to properly and safely fire a gun. Call it a 'bucket list' item.
The arguments I've read for the pro-gun side center on the premise that guns are only bad when they are in the wrong hands. Right now the majority of the suggestions for solution are to have more guns. I equate this solution to the Cold War nuclear arms race. How many times did we need to destroy the world before we ever felt safe - and did we really ever feel safe? The anti-gun argument seems centered on limiting the guns that are out there for people to own. Get rid of the guns and no one gets hurt. (These are severely paired down here because I just don't want to write a 5000 word essay on all of the pro's and con's of gun ownership in America...)
I do not think the answer is to take away the guns. It would never work. There are too many out there to begin with and we are too deeply entrenched in our 2nd Amendment Rights. Get rid of assault weapons - well, what is an assault weapon? I've seen people struggle with what actually defines an assault weapon. I don't have one (definition or assault weapon) so I'm not going to offer an attempt to define them here. Throw more guns into the fire? Really? So they can eventually end up in the wrong hands also?
The majority of the mass shootings that have occurred lately involve 'legally owned' guns. The guy in Connecticut took his from his mom after he killed her. She had legally purchased them and was within her right to own them based on the laws today. I heard another story where a guy bought an AR-15 for over $1000, fell onto hard times and sold his gun for $100 to get by. That weapon was then used to shoot up a party because the kids that now had possession of the gun weren't invited.
The Conservatives are both right and wrong here. Right in the sense that guns are only bad when they get into the wrong hands. Wrong in the sense that more guns will NOT solve the problem. Here is my suggestion to help with the problems today (and what I love about is that it came from some of the posts I see from my conservative friends): Revamp the gun registration system nation wide. On top of that, implement standard gun licensing, also nationally. Mirror these processes to our current drivers license and automobile registration programs today. (Some of these suggestions may exist today but only in certain pockets of the country, there is no national standard.)
Licensing - If you want to own a gun you have to take classes, both in a class room setting and an actual field usage setting, to show that you know how to use a gun and the importance of gun safety. Included in the licensing process would be a thorough background check that would involve everyone living in the household of the licensee.
- The background check would include medical history specific to mental health services received by anyone in the family. The hurdles encountered to do this should be less today given the technology that exists with national medical databases and the laws that are in place to protect peoples Personal Health Information (PHI) contained within that database.
- That license would need to be updated every few years and after a few cycles of renewal the licensee would need to retake the classroom and field programs to gain recertification.
- The license would identify what type of gun (based on training and qualifications) that person would be allowed to purchase.
- The license would also identify if a person was registered to be allowed to Conceal/Carry.
- The license would need to be present on a person who was actually carrying a weapon.
- The license would be valid in all 50 States, however if a person moved they would be required to obtain a license in their new State of residence.
Registration - Like automobiles, registration would be an annual requirement. I'm sure we could find a way to do this electronically so that the gun itself would not need to be carried into a government building.
- Registrations would need to be kept with the gun at all times.
- The registration requirements would help to show that guns are not changing hands to people that aren't properly licensed.
- A person selling a gun would be required to notify the gun registration agency that a gun was sold with x number of days.
- The new owner would be required to register that gun with xx number of days.
Laws - Beef up our laws around these two requirements so that when someone doesn't do it, it's a major offense. It should include mandatory jail time and a fine. Lose a gun twice, forfeit your license and remaining guns. Let's get serious about this issue.
I know I probably make this sound pretty easy and recognize there is no easy fix. This issue is a matter of ownership and right now neither side shows much interest in taking any. The bottom line here is this isn't a matter of sides and the question we need to all ask ourselves is - "how much responsibility am I willing to take to make my country a safer place to live".